Commentary for Bava Kamma 107:1

או מבעי ליה לחלק ורבי יהודה לחלק מונפל נפקא ורבנן ונפל טובא משמע

[argued that the word] 'or' was necessary as a disjunctive.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that it should not be thought that there should be no liability unless both ox and ass fell in together. ');">¹</span> And R. Judah? — [He maintained that] the disjunction could be derived from [the use of the singular] And it fall.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [So that 'or' carries the disjunction further to include utensils attached to the animal, v. Malbim, a.l.] ');">²</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 107:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.